
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<article>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type='publisher'>IJRAP</journal-id>
<journal-title>International Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Pharmacy</journal-title>
<issn pub-type='ppub'>2277-4343</issn>
 <publisher>
<publisher-name>Moksha Publishing House </publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type='other'>10.7897/2277-4343.096180</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>COMPARISON OF THE LEAF DRUG RUTA GRAVEOLENS AND ITS SUBSTITUTE RUTA CHALEPENSIS
</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type='author'>
<name>Rubeena Mattummal *</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type='author'>
<name> Divya Kallingilkalathil Gopi</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type='author'>
<name> Sunil Kumar Koppala Narayana</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date>
<month>11</month>
<year>-0001</year>
</pub-date>
<fpage>100</fpage>
<lpage>110</lpage>
<abstract><title>Abstract</title>
Ruta__ampersandsignnbsp;graveolensis known as common rue, belongs to family Rutaceae. Rue oil is obtained from steam distillation of fresh plant material and used as anthelminthic, antispasmodic, antiepileptic, rubefacient and emmenagogue. It__ampersandsignrsquo;s a potential drug used in all the traditional systems of medicine.__ampersandsignnbsp;Aruvatha mattirai__ampersandsignnbsp;andAruvathac curanamare the Siddha formulations prepared from dried leaves of__ampersandsignnbsp;R. graveolens. The leaves of__ampersandsignnbsp;R. chalepensiscommonly known as fringed rue, is reported to be used as a substitute owing to similar morphology in dried form. So this current study is to compare and contrast the authentic drug,__ampersandsignnbsp;R. graveolensfrom its substitute.Methods:__ampersandsignnbsp;Driedleaves of both species were collected from__ampersandsignnbsp;medicinal garden of Siddha Medical College, Arumbakkam. The macroscopic and microscopic details including powder were studied following the standard pharmacopoeial procedures.__ampersandsignnbsp;Results:__ampersandsignnbsp;Macroscopically leaves are different colored with dissimilar shape, in microscopic study__ampersandsignnbsp;R. graveolensshowed toothed lamina with glandular trichomes while__ampersandsignnbsp;R. chalepensisshowed lamina without trichomes. Quantitative__ampersandsignnbsp;microscopy of both species was carried out and the epidermal number, stomatal number, stomatal index, vein islet number, vein islet ratio, palisade ratio was recorded. Powder microscopy of__ampersandsignnbsp;R. graveolensleaves showed the presence of pitted and spiral vessels while__ampersandsignnbsp;R. chalepensisshowed annular and spiral vessels.Conclusion:__ampersandsignnbsp;The study provides the characteristicsfeatures to distinguish__ampersandsignnbsp;R. graveolensfrom__ampersandsignnbsp;R. chalapensis.
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>Adulteration</kwd>
<kwd> Powder microscopy</kwd>
<kwd> quantitative microscopy</kwd>
<kwd> Substitution</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts><ref-count count='56635'/><page-count count='75'/></counts>
</article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list></back></article>
