IJRAP International Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Pharmacy 2277-4343 Moksha Publishing House 10.7897/2277-4343.155167 LEGAL AND ETHICAL THOUGHTS ON ASSESSMENT OF CONSENT: A REVIEW Sud Sushant * Bharati Ashwinkumar S Babaria CH 11 -0001 114 117 In terms of ethics, __doublequotosingconsent__doublequotosing gives a patient the freedom to choose which treatments to accept or reject. Such self-determination is protected by the law pertaining to medical consent, which permits treatment decisions to be made for patients who are incapable of making them for themselves. When a competent patient gives his or her consent voluntarily and in accordance with the information that has been given to them, it is considered valid. What needs to be done, why it needs to be done, and what the treatment__ampersandsign#39;s expected risks and effects are all need to be made clear. Patients who are competent comprehend the information given to them, retain it in their minds, and apply it to decide whether to accept or reject treatment. In the absence of a legal advance directive, medical care decisions made by third parties (doctors, defined proxies, or the courts) must be made and determined in the patient__ampersandsign#39;s best interests. Due to patients__ampersandsign#39; lack of agreement or insufficient consent for various operations, there has been a rise in malpractice litigation in India in recent years. The clinical implications of consent in Indian medicine, as well as its legal and ethical constraints, are not well known to many doctors. In order to provide effective legal protection in a variety of situations, this paper addresses the ethical, legal, and salutary implications of consent in terms of indeed, false, perhaps situations. Consent Legal and Ethical issues Medico-legal care Ayurveda